Credit Available - See Credits tab below.
Total Credits: 1.5 AL General, 1.5 AK General, 1.5 AZ General, 1.5 AR General, 1.5 CA Technology, 1.5 CT General, 1.5 GA General, 1.5 MD General, 1.5 MA General, 1.5 MI General, 1.5 MN General, 1.5 MS General, 1.5 MO General, 1.5 NV General, 1.5 NH General, 1.5 NJ General, 1.5 NY Cybersecurity, Privacy and Data Protection, 1.5 ND General, 1.5 OH General, 1.5 PA General, 1.5 RI General, 1.5 SD General, 1.5 TN General, 1.5 UT General, 1.5 VT General, 1.5 WA Law & Legal Procedure, 1.5 WV General, 1.5 WI General, 1.5 WY General
Technology vendors are deeply embedded in modern legal and business operations—but when those relationships break down, disputes can be complex, expensive, and unfamiliar territory for many litigators. How to Win Tech Vendor Disputes provides a practical roadmap for attorneys litigating against software providers, IT consultants, data processors, and other technology vendors. This program explores viable causes of action, strategies for recovering attorneys’ fees, and how privacy and data issues can shape both claims and discovery.
Learning Objectives:
1. Identify common and effective causes of action in disputes against technology vendors, including contract and statutory claims.
2. Evaluate opportunities to recover attorneys’ fees and enhance damages in tech-vendor litigation.
3. Apply strategic considerations unique to litigating against technology companies, including leverage and risk allocation.
4. Develop targeted discovery strategies for technical systems, data, and vendor documentation.
5. Recognize how privacy, data protection, and information security issues impact claims, defenses, and discovery obligations.
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Approved
CLE programs which take place outside of Alaska or are webcast from outside of Alaska are not required to be accredited by the Alaska Bar Association. Alaska Bar members may claim credit for attendance at CLE programs offered in or from other jurisdictions if the program has been accredited by another MCLE jurisdiction.
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Approved
The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. This activity may qualify for up to 1 hour(s) toward your annual CLE requirement for the State Bar of Arizona, including 0 hour(s) of professional responsibility.
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Provider Number: 3333
Credit Type: Technology
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Provider Number:
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Approved
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Provider Number: 5105
Maryland attorneys do not have MCLE requirements.
Massachusetts attorneys do not have MCLE requirements.
Michigan attorneys do not have MCLE requirements.
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Provider Number: 10280
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Provider Number: N/A
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Provider Number: 50550
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Approved
NHMCLE does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the NH Minimum CLE requirement. The provider believes this course meets the requirements of NH Supreme Court Rule 53 and may quality for 60 minutes toward the annual NHMCLE requirement. New Hampshire attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance.
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Approved
Provider Number: 703
Credit Type: Cybersecurity, Privacy and Data Protection
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Approved
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Provider Number: 14474
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Approved
Provider Number: N/A
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Expires:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Provider Number: SPON00593
South Dakota attorneys do not have MCLE requirements.
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Credit Type:
Law & Legal Procedure
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Provider Number: 9124293
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Approved
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Credit Type: General
Credit Amount: 1.5
Course Type: Live Webcast
Course Expiration:
Status: Pending, Submitted for Accreditation
Sarah W. Anderson owns SWA Law LLC and LegallyCyber.com, representing public and private entities on cyber incident response, regulatory compliance, the implementation of enhanced cybersecurity practices, and contract negotiations for technology products and services. Assisting with over 100 cyber incident responses, Sarah advises leaders and technology professionals on preventing and mitigating liability before, during, and after cyber incidents. She also teaches seminars on cybersecurity and artificial intelligence law across the United States.
Prior to founding SWA Law, Sarah was in-house counsel with a technology non-profit and a “big law” partner, focused on toxic tort and property litigation. Sarah is licensed to practice in Louisiana and Texas. Sarah is also the former chief legal counsel for the State of Louisiana ESF-17 for cyber incident response. Sarah is a proud veteran, serving in the U.S. Army Reserves as a Lieutenant Colonel, and a former Distinguished Military Graduate from the University of Georgia.
